42 Agency
Market Sentiment

Standalone Forecasting Is Getting Squeezed Into the CRM

What revenue leaders and RevOps actually say about Clari, Aviso, Terret (formerly BoostUp), Backstory (formerly People.ai), Mediafly, Scratchpad, Weflow, and Gong Forecast — synthesized from G2, the 2026 M&A + rebrand wave, and practitioner discourse. The forecasting layer is being absorbed by the platform above it and the CRM beneath it — and renaming itself “agents” on the way out.

Updated June 5, 2026 · 9 vendors + the rebrand wave

Our take

Revenue intelligence is the deal-and-forecast layer — “are we going to hit the number?” — and as a standalone category it’s being squeezed from two sides. From above, Clari merged with Salesloft into a ~$450M-ARR “Predictive Revenue System” that folds forecasting into a full platform. From below, the CRM itself is bundling AI forecasting in — Salesforce turned Revenue Cloud into Agentforce Revenue Management and ships Einstein forecasting natively, so the external “revenue database” only pencils out at 500+ reps. The middle is getting thin.

The tell is the rebrand wave. In the last year BoostUp became Terret (“Virtual Revenue Fleet” of agents), People.ai became Backstory (a “revenue answers” platform), and the 2012-era forecasting OG Aviso wrapped itself around MIKI, a multi-agent “AI Chief of Staff.” Nobody wants to be a forecasting dashboard anymore — because passive dashboards lost. The value is moving from a chart a human queries to an agent that reconstructs the deal and produces the number.

The honest problem underneath all of it: forecast accuracy is still a garbage-in problem. Every vendor claims 90–98%; G2’s own reviewers flag inconsistent AI insights and activity that’s logged wrong. The model was never the bottleneck — the CRM data is. That’s why this report’s sibling matters: your forecast is only as good as the calls and activity feeding it. Read our conversation intelligence and sales engagement reports for the layers that actually generate the inputs.

The news layer — M&A and the rebrand wave

How the forecasting category got reshaped

Dec 2021
Mediafly acquires InsightSquared — sales enablement buys a forecasting/analytics leader, folding it into one “enablement + intelligence” platform (now “Mediafly Forecast”). source
Aug 2025
Clari + Salesloft announce a merger — the forecasting category leader combines with an engagement leader, ~$450M combined ARR, ~$10T revenue under management. source
Sept 2025
BoostUp rebrands to Terret and launches a “Virtual Revenue Fleet” of AI agents under new CEO Justin Shriber — an explicit move from “forecasting tool” to “full-stack AI revenue system.” source
Dec 2025
Clari + Salesloft merger closes — Steve Cox CEO, “Predictive / Autonomous Revenue System” positioning, followed by layoffs as the two platforms integrate. Forecasting is now one module of a much larger suite. source
2025–26
Salesforce turns Revenue Cloud into Agentforce Revenue Management and pushes Agentforce Sales + Einstein forecasting natively — the CRM bundles AI forecasting in, squeezing the standalone tools from below. source
Apr 2026
People.ai rebrands to Backstory — from “data & analytics” to an “AI answers platform” that reconstructs what’s happening inside a deal. Same direction as everyone else: away from dashboards, toward answers and agents. source

Six signals reshaping revenue intelligence in 2026

What practitioners and the vendors’ own moves are converging on — with the citations to back it up.

1. The rebrand wave: nobody wants to be a “forecasting tool”

BoostUp → Terret (“Virtual Revenue Fleet”), People.ai → Backstory (“revenue answers”), InsightSquared → Mediafly. Three forecasting vendors renamed themselves away from the dashboard frame in under a year. When a whole category renames itself, the old positioning is dead.

PR Newswire (Sept 2025) — prnewswire.com

2. The squeeze from below is the CRM itself

Salesforce’s Agentforce Revenue Management + Einstein forecasting means the system of record now ships AI forecasting. By one architecture guide, an external revenue database (Clari, Aviso) only justifies itself at 500+ reps; under 50, native CRM AI is enough.

GPTfy architecture guide (May 2026) — gptfy.ai

3. The squeeze from above is the platform

Clari + Salesloft folded forecasting into a ~$450M-ARR “Predictive Revenue System.” Forecasting is no longer the product — it’s one capability inside a suite that also owns engagement, conversation intelligence, and orchestration.

Forrester (Aug 2025) — forrester.com

4. Accuracy is still a garbage-in problem

Vendors advertise 90–98% forecast accuracy, but the recurring G2 complaint is the opposite: “the quality of AI insights is not always consistent” (Terret VP), data logged wrong (Backstory CSM). The model isn’t the bottleneck — the CRM input is.

G2 reviews, Terret + Backstory (2026) — g2.com

5. One platform to replace the stack

Aviso pitches replacing “the Clari + Gong + Outreach stack” with one agentic system and claims up to 50% tech-stack savings. Oliv runs the same play. Reconciling three tools two days a week is the pain every consolidation pitch targets.

The GTM Directory (Apr 2026) — thegtmdirectory.com

6. Dashboards → agents

The frontier is the forecast that generates itself. Instead of a chart a manager queries on Thursday, an agent inspects every deal, flags risk, and produces the board-ready roll-up. Aviso’s MIKI, Backstory’s “answers,” and Oliv’s “death of SaaS dashboards” all bet here.

Oliv (Apr 2026) — oliv.ai
The 2026 revenue-intelligence stack consensus

What credible practitioners actually recommend

Buy forecasting rigor in proportion to your scale, and fix the input before you blame the model.

Under ~50 reps — don’t buy a revenue database

Salesforce Einstein / Agentforce HubSpot forecasting + a hygiene layer (Scratchpad)

50–200 reps mid-market — rigor without enterprise pricing

Terret (~$79/seat) Weflow (SF-native) Mediafly (+ enablement)

500+ reps enterprise — an external revenue database earns its keep

Clari Aviso Gong Forecast (if Gong-anchored)

The frontier — agentic, watch don’t bet

Oliv Drivetrain (CFO/FP&A) Backstory (answers)

The rule that holds across every tier: forecast accuracy is capped by activity-capture quality. Before you pay six figures for a prediction engine, make sure clean call and activity data is actually reaching the CRM — that’s a conversation intelligence problem, not a forecasting one.

Nine vendors, honestly reviewed

G2 ratings are live as of June 5, 2026 with review counts; top cons are clustered from the 10 most recent reviews. Each card carries a corporate-status line — ownership, funding, and rebrands — because in this category the name on the door changed for half of them this year.

Clari

The platform · category definer
G2 4.6 · 5,604 reviews
Corporate status
Now Clari + Salesloft (merger announced Aug 2025, closed Dec 2025; CEO Steve Cox; ~$450M combined ARR; “Predictive / Autonomous Revenue System”). Previously acquired Groove (2023) and Wingman → Clari Copilot (2022). Post-merger layoffs as the platforms integrate.
G2: 4.6/5 (5,604) — g2.com Top G2 cons (n=10): dated UI/UX · reporting gaps · performance

Positive themes

  • The forecasting category definer — deepest time-series revenue model and the default enterprise answer to “will we hit the number?”
  • Now a full platform: forecasting + engagement (Salesloft) + conversation intelligence (Copilot) on one data model
  • Trusted at scale — Adobe, IBM, Zoom, Shopify
Who it’s good for: 500+ rep enterprises where the exec forecast diverges from rep reality and there’s dedicated RevOps to run it.

Critical themes

  • Dated UI even at the top of the category; reporting gaps that are ironic for an analytics platform
  • Merger / roadmap uncertainty and integration disruption post-Salesloft
  • Opaque enterprise pricing (~$160K average contract); heavy to deploy
Who it’s NOT for: teams under ~50 reps, where native CRM forecasting covers it for a fraction of the cost.
“[I’d like] more connections to custom objects like Health, where we can target approaches to customers in retention-related fields.”
G2 review, 4.0★ — Senior Manager, Customer Success, Mid-Market · g2.com

Aviso

Standalone forecasting → agentic
$37M ARR · private
Corporate status
Independent, the forecasting OG (founded ~2012). ~$45M raised (Storm, Scale, Shasta). Revenue 3x’d to $37M ARR in 2025 (from $12.8M). Wrapped its time-series engine in Halo (“AI Single Pane of Glass”) and MIKI, a multi-agent “AI Chief of Staff.” Customers: Lenovo, NetApp, Honeywell, Splunk, Wiz.
G2: standalone listing blocked at pull time — sourced from funding + product coverage Pricing: enterprise-only, ~$25K–85K floor

Positive themes

  • Longest AI-forecasting heritage — a time-series engine refined since 2012, not GPT bolted onto keyword analytics
  • Genuinely agentic now (MIKI multi-agent orchestration); pitches replacing the Clari + Gong + Outreach stack
  • Statistically explainable forecasts (WinScore) at Fortune-500 scale
Who it’s good for: enterprise RevOps (50–500 sellers) with genuine tool sprawl to consolidate and board pressure on forecast accuracy.

Critical themes

  • Smaller installed base and brand than Clari; mid-market awareness is low
  • Enterprise-only pricing and implementation complexity
  • The headline 98% accuracy is a vendor claim — verify against your own pipeline
Who it’s NOT for: mid-market teams wanting modern UX out of the box, or budget-conscious SMBs.
No live G2 rating: Aviso’s G2 page didn’t return microdata at pull time, so we’ve sourced this card from funding data (GetLatka), product coverage, and analyst write-ups rather than a star rating.

Terret (formerly BoostUp)

Mid-market forecasting → agent fleet
G2 4.4 · 615 reviews
Corporate status
BoostUp rebranded to Terret on Sept 9, 2025 under new CEO Justin Shriber (ex-LinkedIn, Oracle), launching a “Virtual Revenue Fleet” of AI agents — an explicit shift from forecasting tool to full-stack AI revenue system. ~$40M+ raised, ~57-person team. Customers: MongoDB, Cloudflare, Carta, Mistral, Teradata, Udemy. Most G2 reviews predate the rename.
G2: 4.4/5 (615) — g2.com (listed as Terret.ai) Top G2 cons (n=10): missing features · onboarding · reporting gaps

Positive themes

  • Clari/Gong-grade forecasting at a mid-market price (~$79/seat)
  • Multi-dimensional forecasting (SaaS, usage, PLG, renewals) with CI fed straight into the machine-forecast model
  • Credible logos (MongoDB, Cloudflare, Mistral) and an agent-fleet roadmap
Who it’s good for: 20–200 reps that want forecasting rigor without enterprise pricing.

Critical themes

  • Mid-rebrand transition — validate the current product state, not old BoostUp docs
  • ~57-person team is a real platform-bet risk for a multi-year commitment
  • AI insights flagged as inconsistent; reporting gaps
Who it’s NOT for: buyers who need a settled (not settling) platform with deep services behind it.
“The quality of AI insights is not always consistent. [I’d] like the ability to get AI insights across a pool of accounts / opportunities.”
G2 review, 4.0★ — VP, GTM Operations, Mid-Market · g2.com

Backstory (formerly People.ai)

Activity capture → “revenue answers”
G2 4.5 · 630 reviews
Corporate status
People.ai rebranded to Backstory in April 2026 — a strategic shift from “data & analytics” to an “AI answers platform” that reconstructs what’s really happening inside a deal. Backed by ICONIQ, Andreessen Horowitz, Lightspeed, Mubadala. Embeds inside Salesforce, Microsoft Copilot, and Claude.
G2: 4.5/5 (630) — g2.com (listed as Backstory) Top G2 cons (n=10): reporting/analytics gaps · performance · customization

Positive themes

  • Deep automated activity-capture heritage — the data foundation for deal reconstruction
  • Now answers, not dashboards: reasons over execution data to say where momentum is breaking and what to do next
  • Lives inside the tools teams already use (Salesforce, Copilot, Claude)
Who it’s good for: enterprise revenue teams that want deal-level answers surfaced inside existing tools, not a separate app.

Critical themes

  • Data-accuracy complaints — activity miscounted (calls logged as meetings)
  • Reporting/analytics gaps and customization limits in G2 reviews
  • Fresh rebrand = repositioning risk; enterprise-only motion
Who it’s NOT for: teams that just want a cheap forecast roll-up rather than a deal-intelligence layer.
“Some of the data doesn’t seem to be very accurate — while I’m not using any dialer tools, it’s being recorded in my performance metrics as calls instead of meetings.”
G2 review, 4.5★ — Customer Success Manager, Mid-Market · g2.com

Salesforce RI / Agentforce

The squeeze from below
Native to the CRM
Corporate status
Salesforce’s native revenue intelligence — Revenue Cloud became Agentforce Revenue Management (2025), with Einstein forecasting and Agentforce Sales agents built into Sales Cloud. The platform every standalone forecaster sells against now bundles AI forecasting directly into the system of record.
No standalone G2 vendor card — sold as part of Sales Cloud / Agentforce Pricing: layered (Sales Cloud + Revenue Intelligence + Agentforce consumption)

Positive themes

  • Native to the system of record — no external revenue database, no sync, no separate login
  • Einstein forecasting is “good enough” for most teams under ~200 reps; Agentforce adds autonomous execution
  • Tableau Next analytics and pre-built CRM skills mean genuine time-to-value if you’re already on Salesforce
Who it’s good for: teams under ~200 reps already on Salesforce where native forecasting clears the bar.

Critical themes

  • Forecasting depth below standalone Clari/Aviso at real enterprise complexity
  • Lock-in and escalating per-seat + consumption costs
  • Agentic-ROI skepticism and “platform fatigue” flagged by analysts
Who it’s NOT for: 500+ rep orgs where the exec forecast diverges from rep reality — there you still reach for an external revenue database.

Mediafly (InsightSquared)

Enablement + forecasting
G2 4.4 · 1,343 reviews
Corporate status
Acquired forecasting/analytics leader InsightSquared in Dec 2021 (now “Mediafly Forecast”). ~$151M raised over 20 rounds, PE-backed (Boathouse, BIP), seven acquisitions. Combines sales enablement (content, value selling) with revenue intelligence in one platform.
G2: 4.4/5 (1,343) — g2.com Top G2 cons (n=10): dated UI/UX · performance

Positive themes

  • Unique enablement + forecasting on one vendor relationship (content engagement + InsightSquared analytics)
  • Mature value-selling and content-engagement analytics
  • Affordable bundled pricing relative to standalone forecasting (~$66K at 50–200 reps)
Who it’s good for: mid-market teams that want enablement and forecasting from one vendor.

Critical themes

  • Forecasting depth below standalone Clari / Aviso / Terret
  • Post-merger brand confusion — the InsightSquared name still lingers
  • Dated UI and AI forecast prediction behind modern challengers
Who it’s NOT for: teams that want best-of-breed forecasting depth above all else.
“I wish the user interface was easier to navigate, specifically when looking for my own uploaded items.”
G2 review, 4.0★ — Customer Success Manager, Mid-Market · g2.com

Scratchpad

Deal execution & CRM hygiene
G2 4.8 · 1,493 reviews
Corporate status
Independent, ~$49.6M raised (Craft Ventures, Accel; Series B 2022), founded by Pouyan Salehi. A sales-execution and CRM-hygiene workspace — fast CRM updates, notes, pipeline views. Not a forecasting product — it’s the input layer that makes a forecast trustworthy.
G2: 4.8/5 (1,493) — g2.com (highest love in this set) Top G2 cons (n=10): integrations/API · learning curve · support

Positive themes

  • The highest-rated tool in this report (4.8) — reps actually enjoy updating the CRM through it
  • Fast, frictionless Salesforce hygiene = cleaner data feeding whatever forecast sits on top
  • Light and inexpensive next to a full revenue platform
Who it’s good for: teams that want rep-friendly CRM hygiene and execution feeding a separate forecaster.

Critical themes

  • Not a forecasting tool — no AI forecast or roll-up; it’s the input, not the prediction
  • Some workflow siloing — “you have to go to Scratchpad to take notes”
  • Integration gaps with parts of the stack
Who it’s NOT for: anyone expecting it to produce the forecast itself — pair it with one.
“It’s not integratable with everything. A lot of the time you have to go to Scratchpad to take notes in Scratchpad. If they had some more obvious integrations, that would be great.”
G2 review, 4.0★ — Account Executive, Mid-Market · g2.com

Weflow

Salesforce-native challenger
G2 4.6 · 119 reviews
Corporate status
Berlin-based, seed-stage (~$5.9M, Gradient Ventures + Cherry), founded 2021. Salesforce-native: activity capture + conversation intelligence + deal scoring + forecasting, all written into native Salesforce objects. Frankfurt data residency (HIPAA/GDPR). Positions as a Gong alternative at ~50% the price.
G2: 4.6/5 (119) — g2.com Top G2 cons (n=10): missing features · performance · learning curve

Positive themes

  • Truly Salesforce-native — writes activity and forecasts into native objects, no separate revenue database to sync
  • Bundles capture + CI + deal scoring + forecasting at a mid-market price (~$79)
  • EU data residency (Frankfurt) and a clean Salesforce-hygiene story
Who it’s good for: Salesforce-native EU and mid-market teams that want one tool plus data residency.

Critical themes

  • Small and seed-stage (119 G2 reviews) — platform-bet risk
  • Feature gaps and performance complaints; learning curve
  • Smaller ecosystem than the incumbents; Salesforce-only by design
Who it’s NOT for: enterprise scale, or any team not standardized on Salesforce.
“I have a problem with the message feature — sometimes I’m added not as cc and this counts for me as ‘no reply in 24h,’ but the topic is covered by another person.”
G2 review, 3.5★ — Client Solutions Manager, Mid-Market · g2.com

Gong Forecast

CI incumbent moving into forecasting
Module of Gong
Corporate status
Gong’s forecasting module — the conversation-intelligence leader ($500M+ ARR) expanding up from CI into forecasting and revenue AI. The mirror image of Clari, which expanded down from forecasting into CI. The two are converging from opposite ends of the same stack.
Sold as part of the Gong platform — see our Conversation Intelligence report Pricing: enterprise; part of the Gong contract

Positive themes

  • Forecast fed by the deepest conversation and activity data graph in the category
  • Cleanest integration for Gong-anchored teams — the call data already lives there
  • Backed by Gong’s agentic roadmap (Mission Andromeda, Gong Credits)
Who it’s good for: Gong-anchored enterprises that want forecasting where their conversation data already sits.

Critical themes

  • Forecasting is newer and lighter than Clari’s or Aviso’s purpose-built engines
  • Enterprise pricing — you’re buying the whole Gong platform, not a standalone forecaster
  • Same complexity and valuation-overhang caveats as Gong itself
Who it’s NOT for: non-Gong shops buying a forecasting tool on its own merits.

New entrants worth watching

Where the value is migrating — agentic forecasting that generates itself, and the finance-side forecast. Too early to bet the quarter on, but each answers “the dashboard era is over.”

Oliv

$5M seed, “Gen-4” agent suite (Forecaster, Deal Driver, Coach, CRM Manager) with modular per-agent pricing and a free recording layer for Gong migrators. The clearest articulation of “dashboards → agents.”

Drivetrain

The entrant coming at the forecast from the finance side — CFO/FP&A planning and modeling rather than rep-level deal inspection. Watch for the RevOps-meets-finance convergence.

Revenue Grid

Salesforce-native, behavior-based forecasting (forecasts off real deal activity, not static CRM stages) with a large installed base. The “native, no RevDB” school.

Outreach Commit · Salesloft

Engagement platforms with embedded forecasting — the inverse path to Clari. Salesloft now sits inside Clari post-merger, so this lane is consolidating too.

The rest of the revenue stack

Methodology. G2 ratings and review counts are live as of June 5, 2026, pulled via Bright Data; top cons are clustered from the 10 most recent reviews per product. Practitioner quotes are sourced from G2 with links. The M&A and rebrand timeline and corporate-status lines are sourced from primary coverage (PR Newswire, BusinessWire, Forrester, Futurum) and dated. Note the 2026 rebrands: BoostUp is now Terret, People.ai is now Backstory, and InsightSquared is now Mediafly — older reviews still reference the previous names. Aviso’s G2 listing was blocked at pull time, so its card is sourced from funding and product coverage rather than a star rating; Salesforce RI and Gong Forecast are sold as platform modules and don’t carry standalone G2 cards. This is sentiment synthesis, not a vendor ranking; where data is thin, we say so.
42/ Newsletter — Weekly B2B marketing insights